jueves, 17 de junio de 2010

Gigantesco hallazgo arqueol en Grecia - Desmentido







Estas fotos asombrosas son de un descubrimiento arqueológico reciente en Grecia; este hallazgo totalmente inesperado suministra prueba de la existencia de ' Nephilim'. Nephilim es la palabra usada para describir a los gigantes para describir a los gigantes que se habla en los tiempos bíblicos por Enoc, así como el gigante contra el cual David luchó (Goliat). Generalmente se cree que la mayoría de estos gigantes vinieron cuando los ángeles caídos se unieron con las mujeres terrenales. Note el tamaño increíble del cráneo.
Gen. 6:4 - Había gigantes en la tierra en aquellos días, y también después que entraron los hijos de Dios a las hijas de los hombres, y les engendraron hijos: éstos fueron los valientes que desde la antigüedad fueron varones de nombre.
Num. 13:33 - También vimos allí gigantes, hijos de Anac, raza de los gigantes: y éramos nosotros, a nuestro parecer, como langostas; y así les parecíamos a ellos.
______________________________________
"Skeleton of Giant" Is Internet Photo Hoax
James Owen for
National Geographic News
December 14, 2007

The National Geographic Society has not discovered ancient giant humans, despite rampant reports and pictures.
The hoax began with a doctored photo and later found a receptive online audience—thanks perhaps to the image's unintended religious connotations.

A digitally altered photograph created in 2002 shows a reclining giant surrounded by a wooden platform—with a shovel-wielding archaeologist thrown in for scale.
(Photo Gallery: "Giant Skeletons" Fuel Web Hoax)
By 2004 the "discovery" was being blogged and emailed all over the world—"Giant Skeleton Unearthed!"—and it's been enjoying a revival in 2007.
The photo fakery might be obvious to most people. But the tall tale refuses to lie down even five years later, if a continuing flow of emails to National Geographic News are any indication. (The National Geographic Society owns National Geographic News.)
The messages come from around the globe—Portugal, India, El Salvador, Malaysia, Africa, the Dominican Republic, Greece, Egypt, South Africa, Kenya. But they all ask the same question: Is it true?

Perpetuating the Myth
Helping to fuel the story's recent resurgence are a smattering of media outlets that have reported the find as fact.
An often cited March 2007 article in India'sHindu Voice monthly, for example, claimed that a National Geographic Society team, in collaboration with the Indian Army, had dug up a giant human skeleton in India.
"Recent exploration activity in the northern region of India uncovered a skeletal remains of a human of phenomenal size," the report read.
The story went on to say the discovery was made by a "National Geographic Team (India Division) with support from the Indian Army since the area comes under jurisdiction of the Army."

ccount added that the team also found tablets with inscriptions that suggest the giant belonged to a race of superhumans that are mentioned in the Mahabharata, a Hindu epic poem from about 200 B.C.
"They were very tall, big and very powerful, such that they could put their arms around a tree trunk and uproot it," the report said, repeating claims that initially appeared in 2004.

Voice editor P. Deivamuthu admitted to National Geographic News that his publication was taken in by the fake reports.
The monthly, which is based in Mumbai (Bombay), published a retraction after readers alerted Deivamuthu to the hoax, he said.
"We are against spreading lies and canards," Deivamuthu added. "Moreover, our readers are a highly intellectual class and will not brook any nonsense."
Other blog entries—such as a May 2007posting on a site called Srini's Weblog—cite a report supposedly published in the Times of India on April 22, 2004. But a search of that newspaper's archive revealed no such article.

Arabian Giant
Variations of the giant photo hoax include alleged discovery of a 60- to 80-foot long (18- to 24-meter) human skeleton in Saudi Arabia. In one popular take, which likewise first surfaced in 2004, an oil-exploration team is said to have made the find.
Here the skeleton is held up as evidence of giants mentioned in Islamic, rather than Hindu, scriptures.
The Debunkers
Web sites dedicated to debunking urban legends and "netlore" picked up on the various giant hoaxes soon after they first appeared.
California-based Snopes.com, for example, noted that the skeleton image had been lifted from Worth1000, which hosts photo-manipulation competitions.
Titled "Giants," the skeleton-and-shoveler picture had won third place in a 2002 contest called "Archaeological Anomalies 2."

The image's creator—an illustrator from Canada who goes by the screen name IronKite—told National Geographic News via email that he had had nothing to do with the subsequent hoax.
He added that he wants to remain anonymous because some forums that debated whether the giant was genuine or not "were turning their entire argument into a religious one." It was argued, for instance, that the Saudi Arabian find was entirely consistent with the teachings of the Koran.
"This was about the same time that death threats and cash bounties were being issued against cartoonists and other industry professionals for doing things like depicting the Prophet Mohammed," IronKite wrote.
How the Image Was Made
IronKite started with an aerial photo of a mastodon excavation in Hyde Park, New York, in 2000. He then digitally superimposed a human skeleton over the beast's remains.
The later addition of a digging man presented the biggest technical challenge.
"If you look, he's holding a yellow-handled shovel, but there's nothing on the end," IronKite said.
"Originally, the spade end was there. But [it] looked like it was occupying the exact same space as the skeleton's temple, making the whole thing look fake.
"Now it looks like he's just holding a stick, and people don't notice. It's funny."
IronKite also altered the color of the man's clothing to create a "uniform tie-in" with the white-shirted observer peering down from the wooden platform.
The two figures work to exaggerate the scale of the skeleton, he added.
(Related: "Shark 'Photo of the Year' Is E-Mail Hoax" [March 8, 2005].)
IronKite said he's tickled that the picture—which took only about an hour and a half to create—has generated so much Internet attention.
"I laugh myself silly when some guy claims to know someone who was there, or even goes so far as to claim that he or she was there when they found the skeleton and took the picture," IronKite said.
"Sometimes people seem so desperate to believe in something that they lie to themselves, or exaggerate in order to make their own argument stronger."
Wanting to Believe
David Mikkelson of Snopes.com said such hoaxes succeed when they seem to confirm something people are already inclined to believe, such as a prejudice, political viewpoint, or religious belief.
A hoax also needs to be presented "in a framework that has the appearance of credibility," he said in an email.
The "ancient giant" has both elements, according to Mikkelson.
"It appeals to both a religious and a secular vision of the world as different and more fantastic than mere science would lead us to believe," he said.
"Proof," Mikkelson added, "comes in the form of a fairly convincing image."
For anyone who may have knowingly propagated the myth, Mikkelson added, the motivation "probably wasn't any different than the motivation for engaging in a game of ringing someone's doorbell and running away—because it's an easy way to have a laugh at someone else's expense."
Alex Boese, "curator" of the virtual Museum of Hoaxes, said fake giants have a long history going back to the at least the 1700s.
The recent hoax is reminiscent of the once famous Cardiff Giant myth, involving a ten-foot-tall (three-meter) stone figure dug up in 1869 in Cardiff, New York, Boese said.
Many people believed the figure was a petrified man and claimed he was one of the giants mentioned in the Bible's Book of Genesis: "There were giants in the Earth in those days."
Likewise, Boese said, the recent giant hoax "taps into people's desire for mystery and their desire to see concrete confirmation of religious legends."
National Geographic News photo editor Sebastian John contributed to this report.
Free Email News UpdatesSign up for our Inside National Geographic newsletter. Every two weeks we'll send you our top stories and pictures (see sample).

13 comentarios:

  1. Que referencias tiene este descubrimiento? parece un nada más un montaje.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Ests fotos son un montaje que se hizo para un concurso fotografico, Nat Geo tuvo que aclarar esta situación ver http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071214-giant-skeleton.html

    ResponderEliminar
  3. necesitamos pruebas cientificas quimicas de estos esqueletos gigantes, parece montaje,donde hay información de cientificos que estudien estos hallazgos.

    ResponderEliminar
  4. Para Anonimo del 28 de Junio. Con respecto a su observación, podrá darse cuenta que en el titulo dice "Desmentido"; y luego del articulo del supuesto hallazgo, coloqué el desmentido (en Ingles) que hiciera The National Geographic Society. Ya estaba asi al momento de Ud. colocar su comentario. Gracias.
    Magda Mascioli G.

    ResponderEliminar
  5. si fuera cierto ese descubrimiento, porque no salióo por todas las noticias del mundo? Porque un hallazgo asi es fuera de serie. Pero creo que solo es una mentira escudado en un fotomontaje

    ResponderEliminar
  6. es cierto nunca salio por las noticias y un hallazgo asi seria algo increible

    ResponderEliminar
  7. Pero es que tienen que seguir leyendo no solo vean las fotos... La parte que sigue que como dijo -Magda- esta en ingles explica que todo es un montaje y habla el mismo creador de las fotos osea son fotos alteradas por medio de programas y no es algo tan dificil de realizar.. y si tienen razon si algo asi realmente hubiese pasado casi que tenia que salir en los periodicos del mundo siendo uno de los hallazgos mas importantes de supongo de este siglo y posiblemente para los siguientes ya que probaria que en algun momento si existieron seres humanos gigantes... por favor en serio lean ( a menos que sea que no conozcan el idioma eso es mas aceptable) ya que toda la informacion se encuentra ahi
    Gracias

    ResponderEliminar
  8. deberían publicar la traducción en castellano, así como ponen el resto de la información que consta en la biblia. De esta manera no habría málas interpretaciones

    ResponderEliminar
  9. es cierto lo que dicen algunos compañeros,, deberian colocar todo traducido.... para que no se vean malos entendidos en la interpretacion...

    ResponderEliminar
  10. Pues yo opino que si no saben Inglés y quieren saber lo que dice, entonces copien y pegenlo en el traductor de Google y santo remedio!

    ResponderEliminar
  11. jajajajaaj true!!!

    ResponderEliminar
  12. Amigos mios:

    Es importante que antes de escribir estos comentarios se ilustren e investiguen al respecto ya que todo esto es totalmente CIERTO, por desgracia los gobiernos estan encontra que la poblacion se entere de la realidad por razones de seguridad y control de todos nosotros.
    Investiguen.

    ResponderEliminar
  13. Un hecho como este no queda en el anonimato. Siempre se filtra la informacion. Esta se hubiera filtrado en los medios y hubiera sido televisada al mundo entero.. Sin duda esto es un sofisticado momtaje. Alla el tonto que lo crea, o listo el religioso que desee tomar ventaja de esto para crear su propia religion y estafar a los tontos.

    ResponderEliminar

Su Comentario